Turner v. School District of Clayton
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Per curiam
The dispositive issue in this case is the declaration that the straightforward and unambiguous language of § 167.131, RSMo 2000,1 applies as written. Plaintiffs are parents and children who reside in the City of St. Louis transitional school district2 but attend schools in the Clayton school district pursuant to tuition agreements. After the transitional school district lost its state accreditation, the parents and children sued the Clayton school district, the board of education of the City *663of St. Louis and the transitional district of the City of St. Louis claiming the transitional school…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Parktown Imports, Inc. v. Audi of America, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Abrams v. Ohio Pacific ExpressSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Hyde Park Housing Partnership v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Cox v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- R.M.A. (a Minor Child), by his Next Friend: Rachelle Appleberry v. Blue Springs R-IV School District and Blue Springs School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
- Roberts v. BJC Health SystemSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
- State v. HardinSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- Harold Lampley and Rene Frost v. The Missouri Commission on Human Rights and Alisa WarrenSupreme Court of Missouri · 2019
- Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hiar Holding, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2013
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.