Legal Opinion

Wabeke v. City of Holland

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1974No. Docket 18076PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.

Plaintiffs, the owners of certain residential lots which abut South Shore Drive in the City of Holland, have challenged the validity of special assessments levied upon them by the City of Holland to help pay for the widening, resurfacing, draining and curbing of South Shore Drive.

Circuit Judge Harold Van Domelen found that the plaintiffs would receive no special benefits from the proposed improvements to South Shore Drive over and above the benefit conferred on the community in general, and permanently enjoined the City of Holland from levying a special assess*218ment upon plaintiffs. From that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fluckey v. City of PlymouthMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Brill v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  3. In Re Hartman EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Axtell v. City of PortageMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Frischkorn Investment Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rowley v. MurrayNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Tack v. City of RosevilleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Johnson v. City of InksterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Bales v. State Highway CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Production Tool Supply Co. v. City of RosevilleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API