Legal Opinion
Hagar v. Zaidman
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 19, 1992No. Civ. 5-91-382 (WWE)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
FACTS
Defendants Serge Zaidman and Professional Sportcard Grading Service, Inc. [“PSG”], move, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2), to dismiss the complaint of Plaintiffs Alan Hagar and Acu-Card, Inc. [“ACI”] for lack of personal jurisdiction, and in the alternative move, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(3) and 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), to transfer this action to the Centra] District of California. Motion papers reveal the following facts.
Hagar is a Connecticut resident. ACI is a Connecticut corporation with its principal…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Harold Noel Arrowsmith, Jr. v. United Press InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Marine Midland Bank, N.A. v. James W. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Vertrue Inc. v. MeshkinDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Milne v. Catuogno Court Reporting Services, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
- Austen v. CATTERTON PARTNERS V, LPDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Chemical Trading, Inc. v. Manufacture De Produits Chimiques De TournanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- American Homecare Federation, Inc. v. Paragon Scientific Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.