Legal Opinion

Blunt v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 2, 2005No. A05A1614PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

Richard Blunt and Randolph McKinney were charged with the armed robbery of Barbara Howard and Mia Musciano in one incident, and of Matt Dill and Sean Lucas in a separate incident. At a jury trial, Blunt was convicted of all charges. Following the denial of his motion for new trial, Blunt appeals his convictions. He complains primarily of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Because Blunt has not shown any act or omission by counsel that was both deficient and prejudicial, we affirm.

Prior to trial, Blunt and McKinney moved to suppress any pretrial or in-court identification…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Momon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Tenorio v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. Bryson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Hammock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. In the Interest of E. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. Wilburn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API