Hammock v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
MCFADDEN, Judge.
Michael Hammock was convicted of theft by taking an automobile. He appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence and the effectiveness of his trial counsel. We find the evidence sufficient to sustain the conviction. In so finding, we disapprove our earlier decision, In the Interest of C. G., 261 Ga. App. 814, 815 (584 SE2d 33) (2003), to the extent that it deems testimony describing nonverbal conduct depicted on a surveillance videotape to be hearsay. We also find that trial counsel’s performance was not deficient. We therefore affirm.
1. On appeal from a criminal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDougal v. McCammonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- Pruitt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Davis v. CIVIL SERV. COM'N OF PHILADELPHIACommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Darnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Yost v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Smoot v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Bearden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Ostalaza v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.