Legal Opinion

Dodge v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 1938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In the submission of controversy the parties stipulated that “ plaintiff did not write upon his payroll receipts for the period from January 1, 1934 to June 30, 1937 that the amount received by him was received under protest.” Under the provisions of section 149 of the Charter of the City of New York (Laws 1901, ch. 466, as amd.) there can be no recovery upon any further claim for salary. (See opinion in Quayle v. City of New York, 278 N. Y. 19, decided herewith.) We do not pass upon any other question.

The judgment should be reversed and (the complaint dismissed, without costs. (See 278 N. Y.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Quayle v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kelley v. McGeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Finn v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Shevlin v. LaGuardiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  4. Dodge v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Finn v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API