Dodge v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
In the submission of controversy the parties stipulated that “ plaintiff did not write upon his payroll receipts for the period from January 1, 1934 to June 30, 1937 that the amount received by him was received under protest.” Under the provisions of section 149 of the Charter of the City of New York (Laws 1901, ch. 466, as amd.) there can be no recovery upon any further claim for salary. (See opinion in Quayle v. City of New York, 278 N. Y. 19, decided herewith.) We do not pass upon any other question.
The judgment should be reversed and (the complaint dismissed, without costs. (See 278 N. Y.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Quayle v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kelley v. McGeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Finn v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Shevlin v. LaGuardiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Dodge v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Finn v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.