Legal Opinion

Ernest Fleshman, on Behalf of Lisa Fleshman v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 22, 1983No. 82-1081PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAGG, District Judge:

This action was brought under § 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to obtain judicial review of a final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services awarding Lisa Fleshman supplemental security income (hereinafter “SSI”) benefits but at a reduced level. The district court reversed the Secretary’s decision. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the district court failed to apply the correct standard of review to the Secretary’s decision and, therefore, REVERSE the district court.

Proceedings Below

The focal point of this dispute has…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Broz v. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sherrod v. HegstromDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1985
  2. Herrick v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Fransen v. Iowa Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  4. Gary Tyrrell v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  5. Dawn Driggins, by Her Guardian Ad Litem, Virgil S. Driggins v. Margaret Heckler, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API