Legal Opinion
Sherrod v. Hegstrom
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided October 22, 1985No. Civ. 85-1322-FRPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRYE, District Judge:
The matters before the court are the parties’ motions for summary judgment.
UNDISPUTED FACTS
Plaintiffs are families receiving or applying for Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) who have residing in their family units both dependent children and children who receive independent child support payments from non-custodial parents. Prior to October 1984, there was no requirement that all family members residing in a single family unit be included in an application filed for AFDC. Prior to October 1984, a family applying for assistance could exclude from its family…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Califano v. AznavorianSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gorrie v. HecklerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
- Brown v. HecklerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bowen v. GilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- De Jesús Cotto v. Departamento de Servicios SocialesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1989
- Gorrie v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Ardister v. MansourDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1986
- Showers Ex Rel. Colon v. CohenDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.