Legal Opinion

Finnesey v. Seattle Baseball Club, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1922No. 17516PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

— Appellants, as plaintiffs, sought by their first cause of action to recover damages for an alleged unlawful ejection of appellant James L. Finnesey from the Seattle Baseball Park, and by their second cause of action sought an injunction restraining respondents from interfering with Finnesey’s attendance there at games to be thereafter played. At the hearing of the application for a temporary injunction, the trial court sustained a demurrer to that cause of action and denied injunctive relief. Thereafter the case came on for trial on the first cause of action before another judge, sitting…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Pantages Theatre Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Marrone v. Washington Jockey ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Collister v. . HaymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Davis v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. People Ex Rel. Burnham v. . FlynnNew York Court of Appeals · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. > FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES, TENINO AERIE NO. 564 v. Grand Aerie of Fraternal Order of EaglesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Fell v. Spokane Transit AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Fell v. Spokane Transit AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Fraternal Order of Eagles, Tenino Aerie No. 564 v. Grand Aerie of Fraternal Order of EaglesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Browning v. Slenderella Systems of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API