Darius Young v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BELSON, Senior Judge:
Darius Young appeals his convictions for carjacking, first-degree theft, and unauthorized use of a vehicle, arguing that the trial court abused its discretion by admit ting lay witness opinion testimony that identified him in surveillance footage. We conclude that the testimony was admissible under Sanders v. United States, 809 A.2d 584, 596 (D.C.2002), and affirm.
I
On April 9, 2011, at around 12:80 p.m., Mr. Dongni Pho was standing outside of his Lexus SUV in a service station as he finished pumping gas. A man ran up to the SUV, jumped in, locked the door, and drove away.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- ALONZO R. VAUGHN and CARL S. MORTON v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Sanders v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Gee v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HickeyNebraska Court of Appeals · 2019
- Geter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
- Hilton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JAMAL C. NURSE (15-07-0704, MORRIS COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JARRELL SWEET (16-01-0042, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.