Ellison v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.
Larry Martin Ellison pled guilty to sexual assault but chose to have a jury decide his sentence. During punishment, a probation officer testified that Ellison was not a “suitable” candidate for community su pervision. The Court of Appeals held that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in admitting the testimony. 1 We affirm its judgment and hold that suitability is a matter “relevant to sentencing” under Article 37.07, Section 3(a).
Facts and Procedural History
Ellison pled guilty to sexually assaulting a thirteen-year-old girl and chose to have a jury determine his punishment.…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Wyatt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Osbourn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Haley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by190 opinions
- Beham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Prine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Hollis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
- Sims v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.