Legal Opinion

Ellison v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided September 13, 2006No. PD-0863-05PublishedCited by 190 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.

Larry Martin Ellison pled guilty to sexual assault but chose to have a jury decide his sentence. During punishment, a probation officer testified that Ellison was not a “suitable” candidate for community su pervision. The Court of Appeals held that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in admitting the testimony. 1 We affirm its judgment and hold that suitability is a matter “relevant to sentencing” under Article 37.07, Section 3(a).

Facts and Procedural History

Ellison pled guilty to sexually assaulting a thirteen-year-old girl and chose to have a jury determine his punishment.…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Wyatt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  3. Osbourn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Haley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  5. Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by190 opinions

  1. Beham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
  2. Prine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Hollis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  4. Sims v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007

185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API