Legal Opinion

Southern Transp. Co. v. Unkel

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 1, 1916No. 26PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Admiralty. Suit by the Southern Transportation Company against P. W. Unkel. Decree for libelant.

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

This controversy had its beginnings in two charter parties entered into, one on November 13, 1914, for the charter of the barge Pamunky; the other on December 12, 1914, for the charter of the barge Wicomico. The barges were to carry lumber from Acquia Creek, Va., to Philadelphia. The place of shipment in the first charter party is given as Quantico, and in the other as Cole Randing. The pertinent provisions of the contracts will be stated in connection with the points raised.

The claim of the libel is for demurrage, dead freight, and towage. The issues as raised by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crossman v. BurrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Burrill v. CrossmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1895
  3. Burrill v. CrossmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1894

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bruusgaard v. AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  2. Perkins v. Lawrence Sperry Aircraft Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1932
  3. Fido v. BrazileiroDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1919
  4. Mikkelsen v. A Cargo of SugarDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1918
  5. P. Dougherty Co. v. 2471 Tons of Coal Ex Barge AnnapolisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API