Legal Opinion

Bruusgaard v. Acosta

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 6, 1923No. Nos. 254, 255PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

These are two suits in admiralty; one being brought to recover demurrage on the bark Marpesia, and the other *959seeking to recover demurrage and damages for failure to perform a charter party on the vessel Clyde. In the first of these suits (the Marpesia) the court below dismissed the libel. In the second (the Clyde) the libelant was held entitled to recover both demurrage and damages. The libelant has appealed in the first case. The respondents have appealed in the second. The two appeals were heard together in this court, and will each be disposed of in this opinion.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Texas Co. v. Hogarth Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Crossman v. BurrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. International Paper Co. v. the Schooner "Gracie D. Chambers"Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Crossman v. BurrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
  2. Yone Suzuki v. Central Argentine Ry., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  3. Seedman v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  4. United States v. Atlantic Refining Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1951
  5. Gulf Puerto Rico Lines, Inc. v. Associated Food Co., Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API