Daredevil, Inc. v. ZTE Corporation
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION DAREDEVIL, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 4:12 CV 01166 RWS ) ZTE CORP., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Plaintiff Daredevil, Inc. (Daredevil) sued ZTE USA, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Defendant ZTE Corp., for breach of contract, fraud, and unjust enrichment. The case went to arbitration. Because Daredevil had not sued ZTE Corp. at the time of the arbitration, the arbitrator found that Daredevil’s claims against ZTE Corp. were outside the scope of the arbitration. After the arbitrator made this…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Ellis Crossley v. Georgia-Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- PTA-FLA, Inc. v. ZTE USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.