Legal Opinion
Pietromonaco v. Schwartzman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 1, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for dental malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Franco, J.), dated December 24, 1997, as granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint to the extent of dismissing as time-barred all claims arising from acts committed by the defendants *475prior to October 30, 1993, and denied their cross motion for leave to amend the verified bill of particulars to assert additional dates of treatment.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nykorchuck v. HenriquesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Young v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Chesrow v. GalianiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Grippi v. JankunasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Merriman v. SherwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by4 opinions
- Couch v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Smith v. FieldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Britton v. GarsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Cohen v. GoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018