Legal Opinion

Grippi v. Jankunas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 19, 1996PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for dental malpractice, etc., the defendant Leonard Jankunas, D.D.S., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lane, J.), dated September 22, 1995, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to treatment rendered before January 18, 1992, on the ground that recovery therefor is barred by the Statute of Limitations.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted to the extent that the complaint is dismissed insofar as it seeks to recover damages…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Nykorchuck v. HenriquesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Massie v. CrawfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Ganess v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Iazzetta v. VicenziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Couch v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Chulla v. DiStefanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Kimiatek v. PostAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Ashmead v. GroperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Schreiber v. ZimmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API