Legal Opinion
Richards & Conover Co. v. Leishman
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 15, 1948No. 3577PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS., Chief Judge.
Leishman brought this action against The Richards and Conover Company for alleged infringement of claims 7 to 11, inclusive,1 of Reissue Patent No. 20827.
*366From a decree holding the claims in suit valid and infringed, The Richards and Con-over Company has appealed.
The original patent was applied for December 15, 1934, and granted February 15, 1938. The reissue patent was applied for May 23, 1938, and granted August 16, 1938. The original .patent contained six claims. The reissue patent contained the claims of the -original patent and additional claims 7 to 12, inclusive.
Th…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hollister v. Benedict & Burnham Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Callison v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Leishman v. Associated Wholesale Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- Leishman v. Associated Wholesale Electric Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1941
- Turner v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kobe, Inc. v. Dempsey Pump Co. Dempsey Pump Co. v. Kobe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Mott Corporation and C. W. Mott Research Engineers v. Sunflower Industries, Inc. And Owen Murrell CrumpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Leishman v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Cyclo Floor Machine Corp. v. National Housewares, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1968
- Raymond M. Carson and Louis A. Rosproy v. Charles Bland and B & D Distributing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.