Legal Opinion

Raymond M. Carson and Louis A. Rosproy v. Charles Bland and B & D Distributing Co.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 10, 1968No. 9329_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Circuit Judge:

The appellants, Raymond M. Carson and Louis A. Rosproy, brought this suit for infringement of United States Letters Patent No. 2,918,310 against B & D Distributing Company and Charles Bland, the president and sole shareholder of B & D. Carson is the inventor and owner of the patent; Rosproy is Carson’s exclusive licensee. The appellees denied infringement and asserted that the patent was invalid. The United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, sitting without a jury, found that the patent in suit had not been infringed and that the Carson patent was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  5. Admiral Corporation v. Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. The Eimco Corporation v. Peterson Filters and Engineering Company and Komline-Sanderson Engineering CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  2. James Nelson Hinde and Hinde Engineering Company v. Hot Sulphur Springs, ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  3. The Ohio Citizens Trust Company, Trustee, and Telepro Industries, Incorporated v. Lear Jet CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  4. Cyclo Floor Machine Corp. v. National Housewares, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API