Legal Opinion
Wilmot v. McNabb
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 2, 2003No. C-02-03720-JFPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
FOGEL, District Judge.
Defendants Cambridge Investment Research, Inc. (“Cambridge”), American Investors Company (“AIC”), National Financial Services Corporation (“NFS”), and First Trust Corporation (“First Trust”) and Fiserv, Inc. (“Fiserv”) move separately to compel arbitration and to stay proceedings in the above-entitled matter. De fendant John Roslund joins in the motion of AIC. Plaintiffs oppose. The Court has read the moving and responding papers and has considered the oral arguments of counsel presented on April 7,…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation, a Massachusetts Corporation v. Michael Scott Grunwald, a California ResidentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Alan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Naria v. Trover Solutions, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Credit Suisse First v. GrunwaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Marselian v. Wells Fargo and CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021