Legal Opinion
Marselian v. Wells Fargo and Company
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 20, 2021No. 4:20-cv-03166Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SETO MARSELIAN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-03166-HSG 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 24 10 WELLS FARGO AND COMPANY, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Pending before the Court is the motion to compel arbitration filed by Defendants Wells 14 Fargo & Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Dkt. No. 24. The Court held a hearing on 15 December 10, 2020. For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion to compel. 16 I. BACKGROUND 17 In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Epic Systems Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.