Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bauder v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided June 30, 1994No. 04-93-00725-CRPublished

1DissentButts, Justice

I respectfully dissent. The record and conclusions of the trial judge, viewed objectively, indicate the prosecutor’s misconduct deprived the defendant of his jury. The United States Supreme Court set the federal double jeopardy standard for the defendant’s predicament, which Texas courts have so far interpreted to be consistent with the Texas Constitution: “Only where the governmental conduct in question is intended to ‘goad’ the defendant into moving for a mistrial may a defendant raise the bar of double jeopardy to a second trial after having succeeded in aborting the first on his own…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API