Watts v. Slough
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
Plaintiff Brenda Watts filed suit asserting eight claims for relief based on her loss of $243,000 as a result of an investment made in reliance on representations and omissions by defendant Sharon Slough that Ms. Watts contends were materially false and misleading. Defendants appeal from the trial court’s entry of partial summary judgment in plaintiffs favor as to two claims for relief and its denial of summary judgment as to the remaining six claims for relief. Because defendants’ appeal is interlocutory and does not affect a substantial right, we dismiss the appeal.
In the spring…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- First Atlantic Management, Corp. v. Dunlea Realty, Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Steadman v. SteadmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Beau Rivage Plantation, Inc. v. Melex USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bumpers v. COMMUNITY BANK OF N. VIRGINIASupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
- Webb v. WebbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Bombardier Capital, Inc. v. Lake Hickory Watercraft, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Wolfe v. VillinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Wolfe v. VillinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005