Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wolfe v. Villines

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 5, 2005No. COA04-467Published

1DissentTyson, Judge

The majority’s opinion reverses the trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment in plaintiff’s favor and holds genuine issues of material fact exist concerning: (1) whether the Offer is void for latent ambiguities with the property description; and (2) which parcel should be conveyed. This appeal is interlocutory and defendants failed to comply with the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure and should be dismissed. I respectfully dissent.

I. Interlocutory Appeals

Interlocutory appeals are those “ ‘made during the pendency of an action which do not dispose of the case, but instead…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Jeffreys v. Raleigh Oaks Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API