Legal Opinion
Castaline v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 28, 1975No. Civ. 44149PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, P. J.
Both defendant City of Los Angeles (City) and plaintiffs Bernard and Marilyn Castaline appeal from a judgment in plaintiffs’ favor. Trial was by jury.
Facts
The basic facts in this chain-reaction automobile collision incident are undisputed. On July 21, 1969, a Monday, at about 6:30 a.m., plaintiffs were driving in the northbound number two lane of the Golden State Freeway in the San Fernando area near the Hollywood Freeway interchange. A street sweeper was moving southbound on the freeway, half on the shoulder of the road and half in the number four lane. The sweeper swerved…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shoei Kako Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Petersen v. City of VallejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Campain v. Safeway Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Associates Discount Corp. v. Tobb Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Mowry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Levy-Zentner Co. v. SOUTHERN PAC. TRANSPORTATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Phillips v. Cooper Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Cottini v. Enloe Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.