Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 2004No. 2002 CW 1936 RPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

873 So.2d 32 (2004)

Wade CLARK, Perry Tucker, Ann Guidry, Martha Lacaze and Harry Dawsey, Each Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated

v.

STATE of Louisiana.

No. 2002 CW 1936 R.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

January 28, 2004.

Writ Denied April 23, 2004.

Stan P. Baudin, Patrick W. Pendley, Plaquemine, Counsel for Plaintiffs/Applicants Wade Clark, et al.

Geneva Landrum, Baton Rouge, Counsel for Defendant/Relator State of Louisiana, Department of Revenue.

Before: DOWNING, GAIDRY, and CIACCIO[1], JJ.

GAIDRY, J.

This class action comes to us on remand from the Louisiana…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Moore v. RoemerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  2. Church Point Wholesale Beverage Co., Inc. v. TarverSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  4. Metro Riverboat Associates, Inc. v. Louisiana Gaming Control Bd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  5. ANR Pipeline Co. v. Louisiana Tax Com'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. St. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2009
  2. Crowe v. Bio-Medical Application of Louisiana, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Taylor v. HANSON NORTH AMERICALouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. DaimlerChrysler Services of North America, L.L.C. v. Secretary, Department of RevenueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Bridges v. BullockLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API