Legal Opinion

Bouher v. Aramark Services, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 2009No. C-080535PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dinkelacker, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellants, Christina and Michael Bouher, filed a product-liability suit against several defendants, including defendant-appellee, Food Equipment Technologies Company (“FETCO”), after Christina was severely burned while picking up a cup of hot water. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of FETCO. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

I. Facts and Procedure

{¶ 2} The record shows that on the day she was injured, Christina went to her employer’s cafeteria to get hot water to make a cup of tea as she had done almost every morning of her long-time…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. Burton, 06ap-690 (4-24-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Willie C. Gossett v. Chrysler Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. v. Raymond Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. McNeal v. DurraniOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. State v. ReeseOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Sarah Kilgore v. Revlon Consumer Products, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API