Bouher v. Aramark Services, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Dinkelacker, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellants, Christina and Michael Bouher, filed a product-liability suit against several defendants, including defendant-appellee, Food Equipment Technologies Company (“FETCO”), after Christina was severely burned while picking up a cup of hot water. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of FETCO. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
I. Facts and Procedure
{¶ 2} The record shows that on the day she was injured, Christina went to her employer’s cafeteria to get hot water to make a cup of tea as she had done almost every morning of her long-time…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. Burton, 06ap-690 (4-24-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Willie C. Gossett v. Chrysler Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Newell Rubbermaid, Inc. v. Raymond Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- McNeal v. DurraniOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. ReeseOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Sarah Kilgore v. Revlon Consumer Products, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026