Legal Opinion

Kokomo Rubber Co. v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 15, 1924No. 15521PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

1. Assuming that the plaintiff, or, instead, his lessee, the .Hughes Piano Company, might have been entitled to an action against the defendant for the recovery of possession, or for mesne profits (38 Cyc. 1072-3; Parker v. Salmons, 113 Ga. 1167 (5), 39 S. E. 475; Bigelow on Torts, p. 233), such is not the character of the action as brought. The suit is not sustainable under the Civil Code, § 4471, providing that the bare right of possession of-land authorizes the recovery of damages for the withholding of the 'right, for two reasons: First, if, before…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Luke v. DuPreeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Byrd v. EnglishSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  4. Employing Printers Club v. Doctor Blosser Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Daugherty v. HerzogIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whitfield v. GayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  2. Kokomo Rubber Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API