Legal Opinion
Ampara Chavez-Raya and Gloria Quintanar De Chavez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 16, 1975No. 74-1482PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELL, Circuit Judge.
The issue presented by this case is whether the failure to give Miranda 1 warnings to an alien renders his statements inadmissible in deportation proceedings.
The petitioners, Ampara Chavez-Raya and Gloria Quintanar de Chavez, are husband and wife and are natives and citizens of Mexico. According to the petitioners’ offer of proof, which was presented at the deportation hearing, the facts surrounding their interrogations are as follows: 2
On April 25, 1973, investigators from the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) came to the hotel where Mr. Chavez was working and…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Bridges v. WixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Petzoldt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
- Miguel Tejeda-Mata v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Ramon Trias--Hernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Leroy HenryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.