Legal Opinion

State v. Proctor

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 7, 2001No. 3341PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONNOR, Judge:

James D. Proctor appeals the order finding him in violation of probation. Proctor contends he was not on probation but was actively serving his sentence under the Youthful Offender Act, S.C.Code Ann. §§ 24-19-10 to -160 (1989 & Supp.2000). We reverse.

FACTS

On December 11, 1997, James D. Proctor was sentenced to fifteen years for second degree burglary, suspended on the service of five years probation, and to twenty-five years for second degree arson, suspended on the service of five years probation. At the same time, Proctor was sentenced to five years under the Youthful Offender…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crooks v. Sanders, SuperintendentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  2. State v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Sanders v. MacDougallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  4. Thompson v. South Carolina Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AllenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. PaulingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
  5. State v. HillCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API