Legal Opinion
Beavers v. Victorian
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided March 27, 2014No. Case No. CIV-11-1442-DPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TIMOTHY D. DeGIUSTI, District Judge.
Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Against Bee-Line Delivery on Claim of Vicarious Liability for Negligence of Defendants Copeland and Victorian [Doc. No. 46] and Defendant Bee-Line Delivery Service, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 202], filed pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56. The Motions are fully briefed and at issue.1 Because they involve over*1262lapping claims and issues, the Motions will be addressed together.
Factual and Procedural Background
This personal injury case arises from a traffic accident in Colorado…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Scott v. MilosevicDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2019
- Cruz v. LopezNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- Le v. Total Quality Logistics, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
- Courtney v. IvanovDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Lueders v. ArpDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.