Legal Opinion

Oakes v. Megaw

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 19, 1989PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

Rose Oakes and Calvin J. Oakes, the plaintiffs-appellants (the “Oakes”), filed an amended complaint in the Superior Court on August 31, 1988. The amended complaint named, as a defendant, the appellee Jet Group, Inc. (“Jet Group”), which operates the Royal Exchange Restaurant-Bran-mar (“Royal Exchange”). The Oakes alleged that the Jet Group served alcoholic beverages to Steven M. Megaw (“Megaw”) at the Royal Exchange, although Megaw was under the age of twenty-one. The Oakes alleged that Megaw became intoxicated while he was at the Royal Exchange and that Megaw’s intoxication…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wright v. MoffittSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  2. DiOssi v. MaroneySupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  3. Samson v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Charles v. SeigfriedIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Jarrett v. Woodward Bros., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Riedel v. ICI Americas Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
  4. Sowinski v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  5. McCall v. Villa Pizza, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API