Legal Opinion
United States v. Cecilio Esparza-Ponce
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 19, 1999No. 98-50606PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge:
Cecilio Esparza-Ponce appeals his conviction and sentence for violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (unlawful reentry by a deported alien) and 18 U.S.C. § 911 (false claim of U.S. citizenship). He raises three principal issues: denial of due process in his deportation proceedings, the claimed overbreadth of 18 U.S.C. § 911 and violation of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. 2 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On October 10, 1997, Esparza-Ponce attempted to enter the United States claiming to be a U.S. citizen…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Daniel Proa-TovarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Faulder v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Raymond D. Cheely, Jr. Douglas P. GustafsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Enrique Cuevas-Gaspar v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Aurelio Garcia-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Castillo-Cruz v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Pedro Jose Hernandez-Cruz v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- DIAZ-LIZARRAGABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2016
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.