Legal Opinion

Turley v. Arnold

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1943No. 26739. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gunn

The county court of Mercer county rendered a judgment confirming the verdict of a jury assessing benefits to owners of property in the Bay Island Drainage and Levee District No. 1. Plaintiffs, the commissioners of the district, have appealed and the defendants, thirteen owners of lands in the district, have prosecuted a cross appeal.

This proceeding was instituted under section 37 of the Levee Act. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1941, chap. 42, par. 37.) August 12, 1940, plaintiffs filed their amended petition for an additional assessment for proposed improvements. An order was entered finding that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Hines v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Binder v. LanghorstIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Commissioners of Sny Island Levee Drainage District v. ShawIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Freesen v. Scott County Drainage & Levee DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  5. People ex rel. Freeman v. WhitesellIllinois Supreme Court · 1914

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Union Drainage District No. 5 v. HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Pratt v. HayesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  3. Union Drainage District No. 6 of Towns of Bourbonnais & Manteno v. Manteno Limestone Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  4. Bossler v. Countryside Gardens, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. Chicago Park District v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API