Legal Opinion

United States v. Arthur M. Naud

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 29, 1987No. 87-1582PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Arthur Naud pleaded guilty to one count of distributing cocaine, 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and was sentenced to a ten-year term of imprisonment and a special three-year parole term. The district court denied his Rule 35 motion to reduce his sentence, see Fed.R.Crim.Pro. 35, and he appeals. We dismiss the appeal because we lack jurisdiction.

A

Naud timely filed a motion to reduce his sentence which was denied on April 3, 1987; the denial was entered on the court’s docket sheet on April 6. On April 9, Naud filed a pro se notice of appeal and a motion for reconsideration of the court’s denial. The…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baez-Sanchez v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Gustavo Larios CortesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Davis, Leroy, United States of America v. Joseph, TheodoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. United States v. Thomas Howard GarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Michael KwasnikCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API