Legal Opinion

Estate of Whitley v. Anning

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1980No. 7866PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STOKER, Judge.

This is a suit for declaratory judgment for the purpose of determining whether defendant James A. Anning has the legal right to exercise renewal options in two lease agreements.1 The plaintiffs are The Estate of Mary Sue Whitley and M. G. Realty Company, Inc., the owners of the property in question. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of James A. An-ning holding that he has the right to exercise the renewal options as assignee of the leases. The plaintiffs have appealed.

The legal issues in this declaratory action may be stated in relatively simple terms. The facts, the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Roberson v. Pioneer Gas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  2. Smith v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  3. Scurlock Oil Company v. Getty Oil CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  4. Bond v. Midstates Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
  5. J. F. Auderer Laboratories, Inc. v. DeasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Berkeley Dev. Co. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
  2. Bordelon v. BordelonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. R & E Petroleum, LLC, Ragheb Chaar, & Elsie Aradi Versus Lkm Convenience, LLC & Toan HyunhLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2023
  4. Toomer v. City of Lake CharlesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API