Legal Opinion

Slemp v. City of Tulsa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 8, 1929No. 19041PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERR, C.

On the 22nd day of December, 1909, the city of Tulsa, by proceedings in the district court of Tulsa county, condemned for park purposes 33 acres of land belonging to plaintiff, Helen M. Slemp. This tract was, at said time, situated beyond the corporate limits of said city. Plaintiff was, at said time, a minor of 14 years of age and a one-fourth degree blood Creek Indian, and the land condemned constituted a portion of her surplus allotment.

On the 23rd day of September, 1925, plaintiff brought an action in the nature of ejectment against the city of Tulsa to recover said premises. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Balbridge v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Steil v. LeverettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. McNee v. WhiteheadCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. StephensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  2. Trolinger v. CluffIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Johnston v. GuySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Stewart v. FererCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  5. Thomas v. MonroeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API