Legal Opinion

Craig v. Hecht

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 19, 1923No. 82Published

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Certiorari to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals reversing an order in habeas corpus which discharged the petitioner, Craig, from custody under a commitment issued by the District Court in a contempt proceeding. The order of discharge was made by a circuit judge, assigned to the District Court, who directed that, it be recorded in that court.

Read the full summary

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Certiorari to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals reversing an order in habeas corpus which discharged the petitioner, Craig, from custody under a commitment issued by the District Court in a contempt proceeding. The order of discharge was made by a circuit judge, assigned to the District Court, who directed that, it be recorded in that court. I. The district court acted beyond its jurisdiction, because petitioner’s act was not “ misbehavior,” and did not, and could not, “ obstruct ” the administration of justice. II.…

1Opinion of the Court 1

263 U.S. 255 (1923)

CRAIG

v.

HECHT, UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

No. 82.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued October 17, 1923.

Decided November 19, 1923.

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

Mr. Edmund L. Mooney, with whom Mr. George P. Nicholson, Mr. Charles T.B. Rowe, Mr. Frank I. Tierney and Mr. Russell Lord Tarbox were on the brief, for petitioner.

Mr. Solicitor General Beck, with whom Mr. Alfred A. Wheat, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, was on the brief, for respondent.

2Opinion of the Court · McREYNOLDSJustice McREYNOLDS

The opinions below are reported in 266 Fed. 230; 274…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

3Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Ex Parte HudgingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Lau Ow Bew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. McLish v. RoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Toledo Newspaper Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API