Legal Opinion
Richard v. BY MARCEL v. v. CITY OF MEDFORD
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 24, 1996No. Civil Action 95-12770 PBSPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SARIS, District Judge.
Introduction
This matter is before the Court on a motion by Plaintiffs, the parents of Richard V., a minor, to reissue the preliminary injunction, entered on February 13, 1996, and dismissed on February 27, 1996, reinstating Richard as a ninth grade student at Medford High School. Defendants, Medford Public Schools, oppose Plaintiffs’ motion to reopen the case. Because Plaintiffs’ motion does not fall within any of the enumerated grounds for relief from judgment specified in Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), this Court is constrained to deny Richard V.’s present…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 59 v. Superline Transportation Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Robert James Lubben v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 27Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- S.W. v. Holbrook Public SchoolsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002