Tomika Investments, Inc. v. Macedonia True Vine Pentecostal Holiness Church of God, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Judge.
Defendant raises three questions on appeal: (I) whether the trial court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment on defendant’s claim that the deed to its property was void; (II) whether the trial court erred during the trial of this matter in refusing to allow evidence that could have been used to establish the value of defendant’s property; and (III) whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
I
The order granting the motion for partial summary judgment was interlocutory. “ ‘An interlocutory order is one made…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.