Legal Opinion

Tomika Investments, Inc. v. Macedonia True Vine Pentecostal Holiness Church of God, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 2, 1999No. COA98-1387Published

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Judge.

Defendant raises three questions on appeal: (I) whether the trial court erred in granting the motion for summary judgment on defendant’s claim that the deed to its property was void; (II) whether the trial court erred during the trial of this matter in refusing to allow evidence that could have been used to establish the value of defendant’s property; and (III) whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

I

The order granting the motion for partial summary judgment was interlocutory. “ ‘An interlocutory order is one made…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API