Legal Opinion
United States v. Scott William Moses
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 26, 1998No. 95-1827, 96-1789PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSuhrheinrich, J., joined by Cole, J.,
RYAN, J. (pp. 902-05), delivered a separate concurring opinion.
OPINION
SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.
Defendant appeals his jury conviction and sentence for abusive sexual contact and the denial of his motion for a new trial. Defendant claims among other things that the district court erred by denying his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation when it allowed a child witness to testify by closed-circuit television. We hold that the district court failed to comply with the requirements of the Child Victims’ and Child Witnesses’ Rights Act (the “Act”), 18 U.S.C.A § 3509(b)(1)(B) (West Supp.1997),…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. McCollumCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. Anita YatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- The Limited, Inc., and Consolidated Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- In Re Detention of AsWashington Supreme Court · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.