Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Walsh Manning Securities, L.L.C. - errata

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 26, 2003No. 02-9156Errata

1Opinion of the Court

HARDY V WALSH MANNING 02-9156 ERRATA: SEPTEMBER 25, 2003 1 STRAUB, Circuit Judge, dissenting: 2 By remanding to the arbitration panel for clarification as to the underlying legal basis for 3 liability, the majority, in my most respectful view, disregards the well-settled precedent 4 establishing our severely limited review of arbitration awards. It is precisely because arbitration 5 is designed to provide parties with an expedited process for conclusively resolving their disputes, 6 that judicial review of arbitration awards is so narrow. See Amicizia Societa Navegazione v. 7 Chilean Nitrate…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Westerbeke Corporation v. Daihatsu Motor Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  3. Burchell v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  4. Amicizia Societa Navegazione v. Chilean Nitrate and Iodine Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,679 in the Matter of the Arbitration Between Herbert Sobel, and Hertz, Warner & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API