Legal Opinion
Steel v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 3, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Weiss, J.), dated November 30, 1998, which granted the separate motions of the defendants Time Warner Operations, Inc., f/k/a Time Warner Cable, Inc., Time Warner Cable of NYC, a Division of Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P., Brooklyn/Queens Cable Television, and Quics, and the defendant Trinity Communications Corp., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them, and (2) a judgment of the same…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Rosenberg v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Davies v. Contel of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by6 opinions
- Posa v. Copiague Public School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Miller v. Infohighway Communications Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Concord Village Owners, Inc. v. Trinity Communications Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Miller v. Infohighway Communications Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Rusnak v. PaoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.