Legal Opinion

Rusnak v. Paone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action *401to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Frank J. Paone and Sheila Paone appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), dated September 24, 1999, as, upon granting that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was to vacate so much of a prior order of the same court, dated May 26, 1999, as granted their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them upon the plaintiffs’ default in answering, denied their motion.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Rosenberg v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Steel v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API