Legal Opinion

Wilkman v. Banks

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 1, 1953No. Civ. 19874PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Defendants have petitioned for a writ of supersedeas under rule 49, Rules on Appeal (36 Cal.2d 37) to stay proceedings under an adverse judgment, pending determination of their appeal therefrom. The action filed in the superior court, being case 602619, alleged violation by defendants of certain deed restrictions of record by maintaining and operating a sanitarium on defendants’ property, and prayed for a prohibitory injunction. Defendants interposed equitable defenses of changed conditions in the neighborhood, excessive and disproportionate hardship on defendants, and laches.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ohaver v. FenechCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Dry Cleaners & Dyers Institute v. ReissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Board of Dental Examiners v. JamesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Rubin v. American Sportsmen Television Equity Society, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sacramento Newspaper Guild Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Donen v. DonenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API