Legal Opinion

Forbes State Bank v. Higgins

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1931No. File No. 7048Published

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

March i, 1921, L. O. Higgins and C. Reidinger executed and delivered their promissory note for $2,075, complete and regular upon its face, payable to Geo. H. Ladd and Chas. C. Ladd or order. The complaint alleges that the said payee, 'before maturity, for value received, indorsed and delivered the note to the Fanners’ State Bank of Forbes, N. D., and that at the time of the consolidation of the said Farmers’ State Bank and the plaintiff bank the above note became the property of the plaintiff. Defendants pleaded the defenses that the plaintiff was not a real party in interest and that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Pearcy & ColemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  2. Lyle v. BarnesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Bovarnick v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  4. Woonsocket State Bank v. ParsonsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Stocker v. Dobyns-Lantz Hdwe. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API