Woonsocket State Bank v. Parsons
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurch, P. J.
This action is brought to recover two promissory notes of $3,000 each, claimed to have been transferred through an unlawful preference to defendant by the insolvent Woonsocket State Bank on or about the day it was taken over by the superintendent of banks for liquidation. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals from the judgment alone.
Appellant presents several assignments of error which require a review of the evidence. This court has held in several cases that the sufficiency of the evidence cannot be reviewed on an appeal from the judgment alone. Pierce v. Manning, 2. S. D. 517, 51…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pierce v. ManningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Keyes v. BaskervilleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
- Lyle v. BarnesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
- Lee v. Clark Implement Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wolff v. StengerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Johnson v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
- Hadlock, State Bank Com'r v. Callister.Utah Supreme Court · 1935
- Smith v. McCowanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Cleveland Stone Co. v. HollingsworthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.