Legal Opinion
Orenshteyn v. CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided May 20, 2003No. 02-60478-CIVPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Order Granting Summary Judgment
JORDAN, District Judge.
Alexander Orenshteyn sues Citrix Systems for patent infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 281. Citrix answered and interposed a counterclaim that Mr. Orenshteyn’s patents were invalid. On March 6, 2003, Citrix filed a motion for summary judgment on the issues of non-infringement and invalidity. For the reasons set forth below, Citrix’s motion for summary judgment [D.E. 123] is GRANTED.
I. Relevant Facts 1
Citrix, founded in 1989, is the global leader in software technology that allows users to access applications and information,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Orenshteyn v. International Business Machines, Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013