Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Kelm

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided December 2, 1953No. Civ. 4007PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, Chief Judge.

Two questions are presented: (1) Is a sole proprietorship of a business, such as a retail store, a capital asset so that a gain on its sale is a capital gain; and (2) if such a sole proprietorship is not a capital asset, how is it determined what part of the purchase price is attributable to good-will, good-will being a capital asset?

■ Cohen, the taxpayer, operated a retail clothing store at Ladysmith, Wisconsin, for some 23 years until March 16, 1946, when he sold the business to one I. Blustin. No complete inventory was made immediately prior to the sale, but Blustin,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Wickwire v. ReineckeSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Lucas v. Kansas City Structural Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Watson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Solitron Devices, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
  2. Strauss v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1961
  3. District of Columbia v. Acf Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  4. Tunnell v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1957
  5. Dairy Home Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API