Legal Opinion
Strauss v. United States
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided December 12, 1961No. Civ. A. 7529PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEN C. DAWKINS, Jr., Chief Judge.
This is an action to recover certain tax benefits which would have accrued to plaintiff had the Internal Revenue Service not disallowed deductions claimed by plaintiff.
The facts are not in substantial dispute: For many years prior to 1946, what the parties have referred to as the. Schuster partnership operated a wholesale liquor business in Shreveport, Louisiana. The partners were Sam Schuster, Dave Schuster, and Harold Lazarus. In December, 1945, a partnership, known as the Strauss partnership, was formed by Harold Lazarus, Irvin M. Shlenker, Her-
man Masur,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Duffy v. Central R. Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Grace Bros. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Dodge Brothers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- 58th St. Plaza Theatre, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Brecher v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Metropolitan Laundry Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Parmelee Transportation Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- KFOX, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Massey-Ferguson, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
- Meredith Broadcasting Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Joffre v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.