Teamsters Local 384 v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CRAIG, Judge.
Where an employee of a union has suffered an injury in the union’s service, resulting in a residual disability which continues to limit his earning capacity, can the employer-union, by virtue of a membership vote excluding him from the union job, have his worker compensation benefits terminated without showing the availability of other work within his capabilities?
The controlling rule as to termination of benefits is that the employer must prove availability of work within the capacity of the injured employee. Judge Colins has reiterated that rule for this court as follows:
An…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Farquhar v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Petrone v. Moffat Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Scobbie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Trimmer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Williams v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991